The biggest progression in modern feminism is the push towards intersectionality: acknowledging the different social factors that create a person’s privileges and oppressions. For example, a white woman will face oppression and discrimination for her sex from men, but a black woman will experience oppression and discrimination for her race on top of sexism. Meanwhile a transwoman will also face hardships for her gender identity on top of your everyday-run-of-the-mill sexism. By understanding the intersections of gender, race, sexuality, class, and any other indicator of privilege, we come to acknowledge how we as individuals stand in the massive, convoluted hierarchy of privilege.
White feminism essentially fails to understand or acknowledge these intersections, and poses a feminist agenda that is aimed at providing benefits only to white – usually cisgendered – women. A lot of mainstream feminism privileges white women by addressing issues that only affect them or that only they can access. Most body image campaigns are very white feminist; the women they portray are (you guessed it!) white and conventionally beautiful, and they isolate Women of Colour from their messages. Here are two great links to further explain:
http://battymamzelle.blogspot.com.au/2014/01/This-Is-What-I-Mean-When-I-Say-White-Feminism.html#.Vcnk2fmqpBe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHXd_67oZ_M
Taylor Swift’s tweets to Nicki Minaj were depressingly typical of a privileged white feminist.
Let’s walk through what was said: Nicki’s extremely popular music video for Anaconda did not get a nomination for the VMA’s, so she tweeted criticisms of the industry. She pointed out the discrimination she has faced as a black woman, and the way the VMA’s obviously value conventionally white beauty standards in music videos, tweeting “If your video celebrates women with very slim bodies, you will be nominated for vid of the year…” seen as perhaps referencing Taylor Swift’s Bad Blood, which received a nomination. Quickly after, Taylor replied that it was “unlike (Nicki) to pit women against each other.” The ensuing correspondence then mostly revolved around Nicki and Taylor “feuding”; criticising each other and defending themselves.
What’s wrong with what Taylor did? Like a good white feminist, Taylor saw a tweet which was insightfully and powerfully critiquing the way black women are treated in the music industry, and turned it into a big fiasco essentially all about her. She did not acknowledge the nuanced intersection between race and gender, and the resulting discrimination that Nicki would experience but Taylor never will. And so, she blamed Nicki for not being “feminist” because “all women should stick together”. This blanketing of “all women” is pretty damaging in these sorts of situations, because it glosses over the different experiences different women have based on their ethnic, cultural or sexual backgrounds. And when we say “all women”, it often translates to “white women”, effectively marginalising Women of Colour and other minorities from the mainstream. Nicki’s tweets could have potentially brought much needed attention to the racism and racially fuelled sexism in the music industry, but it was forgotten in the midst of Taylor’s self-righteous “feminism”.
And to add salt to the wound, when social media began reporting on the “feud”, it was pretty much straight up racist. We saw the newest examples of the “angry black woman” stereotype come flooding in, as Nicki was suddenly portrayed as angry, ranting, overreacting, and just a typical black woman amirite? Meanwhile Taylor was the misunderstanding victim…?
Of course, Taylor Swift has done many great things in her career, and did apologise for her comments. However she must be held to an extremely high standard because she is so influential, and accepting white feminism from her is just counterproductive.
When Women of Colour bring up issues specific to them, it is not a “danger” to mainstream feminism, or a worrying tangent that takes away from the mainstream women’s rights movement. It is an important discussion that is almost always overwritten and marginalised by feminists who fail to recognise that their oppression as a woman does not cancel out their privilege as a white person. The “Swift-Minaj correspondence of 2015” is just the most recent example of white feminism detrimenting Women of Colour, and intersectional topics. It is a constant issue that is often overlooked because it doesn’t seem problematic at face value to most people.
Don’t jump on the bandwagon just because it’s popular; white women have more influence than WoC and it’s important to recognise this and act on it. Critiquing Taylor Swift for her comments is step one, but calling out any feminist campaign that ignores WoC issues and circumstances is the most effective.
Unfortunately, you will be surprised by how many you see.
Comment below!
Hannah
Really interesting take on the issue, I was just wondering whether Minaj was as innocent or insightful as you were suggesting? Obviously twitter is the graveyard of nuance, but her calling out only the issue of female body image, thus leaving several other sources of the issue unadressed, made it very easy for it to be construed as a slight to the only other female singer nominated, Taylor, whose video clearly celebrates these "slim bodies". Anyway, just my take, really interesting read!
ReplyDeleteHi Andy, glad you enjoyed :)
ReplyDeleteIt is true that "skinny-shaming" is an issue, and one that frequently comes up in pop songs about curvy women (e.g. Meghan Trainor's All About That Based, as well as Anaconda). And sure, Nicki could have taken the opportunity to bring up more issues than just female body image. So yes, Nicki's tweet was not the image of activism perfection. However prejudice against black women for their "unconventional" bodies is most definitely a real problem, and one that does indeed seem to be prevalent in the recent VMA nominations. As a black woman and a member of that oppressed demographic, Nicki is under no obligation to perfectly present her criticisms or her activism; oppressed people should not have the burden of educating an oppressive society. Unlike Taylor Swift, who is white and therefore /is/ obliged to put in a lot of effort to support the anti-racism movement, and present a positive image of feminism in the interest of being a good person.
Basically you're right from a factual point of view that it wasn't a perfect tweet, but once you take into account the nuances of what Nicki should have done vs what Taylor should have done, we see that Nicki should not have to adhere to certain standards as an oppressed person, while Taylor definitely must.
Hope this helps :)
Yeah, I definitely agree with that last statement- I find it's also important when
Delete(funnily enough) looking at Diplomacy on an international scale - ie developed countries should be held to a higher standard than non-developed countries. Just an interesting link imo, and thanks for the reply :)
Nice article! I heard so ppl at school discussing the twitter feud, and you went through it all very well. Cheers for the solid read.
ReplyDeletehey can you do a segment on why women are always said to be more bitchy than men... and the misogyny behind this?
ReplyDelete