WHAT IS PRIVILEGE?
If oppression is Sauron, the lord of all evil in the world,
then privilege is the Ring of Power, the object which fuels his malevolence.
Crummy Lord of the Rings jokes not working for you? All
good, let’s break it down.
Every minute x amount of babies are born, and every minute x
amount of assumptions are made about these teeny tiny humans. If they are born
with a vulva, the doctor announces “it’s a girl!” and doesn’t consider the
chance this person may not identify as female. If they are born with brown
skin, their chances of being harassed or assaulted by police rises
hundred-fold, even though this newborn baby won’t understand what “crime” is
for another few years. Such is the mechanism of society: we are born, and we
are assigned certain privileges. The assignments are not based on our lifestyle
or career choices, they’re not based on our future autonomous decisions,
they’re based on things we have no control over like our genitals, skin colour,
or whether we were born in the public or private maternity ward. In other
words, they are completely and utterly arbitrary. But in society’s eyes, our
privileges are legitimate things that we hold for our entire lives, regardless
of whether we deserve them or not. I’ve done nothing to earn my privilege as a white person, and my brother has never earnt his male privilege, we were just
really fortunate that way.
Ok, so we blindly draw our privileges from a lucky dip… but
what even are they?
Our privileges are things that give us freedom. Freedom to
be who we are comfortable with, in the way my privilege as a cisgender person
allows me to be while a trans person will struggle, or freedom to do what we
want, in the way a man can easily become an engineer, or walk alone at night,
or be congratulated for having multiple sexual partners, as I never will. And
the fact that some privileges are only available to certain groups of people,
even though they are physically applicable to every human being, is inherently
oppressive.
Which leads us to…
WHAT IS OPPRESSION?
Let’s introduce the magic equation: Oppression =
discrimination + power
We’re all used to understanding discrimination and unfair
behaviour towards other people, but what is less commonly understood is that
there is a significant difference between discrimination and oppression. In
short, oppression can only be perpetuated by people who hold the balance of
power. For example, white people both historically and currently hold the
majority of power in the world. We see this through workplace discrimination
against People of Colour, in over-representation of black people in jail, in
racially fuelled police brutality etc. And since society assigns dominance to
white people, discrimination from white people unto People of Colour is
oppression. Similarly, since women are a power minority (numerical
majority/minority doesn’t necessarily coincide with power balances);
discrimination by men against women is oppression.
What is hardest for many people to comprehend is that it
doesn’t work the other way around. If we accept that you need social dominance
behind you for your discrimination to be an oppressive force, power minorities
can never in fact be oppressive towards their oppressors. Yep, this article
will use the word “oppression” way too many times. What this looks like is that
People of Colour can never be “racist” towards white people, and women can
never be “sexist” towards men. The terms racism and sexism, as well as
homophobia, cissexism and any other oppression terminology applies specifically
to the act of oppression. Women have
never held social dominance over men, and People of Colour have never held
societal power over white people, so these minority groups cannot exercise and
“…ism” over their respective majorities. Before people start screaming, I’ll
point out that of course women can discriminate against men, gay people can
discriminate against straight people etc., and they are equally guilty in the
eyes of the law as anyone else. But in order to understand oppression we must
accept that it is a one way street.
A common first reaction to this kind of message is “but the
dictionary…”, because the dictionary defines racism as “The belief that all
members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific
to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to
another race or races.” This does indeed sound like it could apply to anyone,
including white people as potential victims of racism. But the thing to
remember is that the dictionary operates outside a social context, and is not
the be-all or end-all of socially nuanced definitions. It is also worth noting
that the dictionary was and currently still is written by white men…
coincidence? Maybe. Maybe not.
A good resource: http://everydayfeminism.com/2015/01/reverse-oppression-cant-exist/
Anyway, why is it so important to correctly understand
oppression?
When people insist that “reverse sexism” or “reverse racism”
exist, they quickly erase the reality of those words as an inherently
oppressive force that historically and currently
operates only in a top-down system. Spreading the idea that white people or men
are victims of oppression easily silences the struggle of women or POCs,
because society gives more attention and airtime to the dominant social majorities.
It also allows people in an oppressive group to shuck off their responsibility.
Oppression will only end when everyone accepts their position as a cog in an
oppressive society, and fixes it within themselves. For example, I am a mixture
of perpetrator and victim in oppression, and in the position where I belong to
a power majority (white people, hetero-cis people etc.) I accept that my mere
existence adds to an oppressive mechanism, and that I have to work twice as
hard to take down my conditioned prejudices and create equality in the way I
treat the people around me. If I was to believe that white people are also
victim to racism, I wouldn’t view it was so important to listen to the experiences
of discrimination against black or brown people. I would also feel as entitled
to the benefits of the anti-racism movement, which I definitely don’t need, and
would just be taking away from those who truly do need that empowerment.
It’s a hard truth to swallow, but probably one of the most
important steps in the quest to reshape our inherently screwed up society into
a place where everyone has an actual chance of being who they want to be, and
doing what they want to do. In summary: we are all Frodo, and must destroy the
Ring and return equality to (Middle) Earth. Also in summary: I should stop.
Leave your thoughts, questions, and comments below. This is
a very complex and worthy discussion that I am definitely willing to pick up
with anyone J
Hannah
http://theroguefeminist.tumblr.com/post/69108181677/if-youre-white-dont-call-yourself-an
ReplyDeleteDo You Agree? I personally am Hesitatn but want 2 Know what you think. THanks.
Whilst I agree that white feminists need to make sure they don't appropriate language specific to WoC, I'm inclined to disagree with that post simply because I do not think most feminists restrict "intersectionality" as a term that only applies to the intersection of gender and race for WoC. I have always seen it used to describe any intersection, be it class, sexuality, ability, neurodiversity, etc. and I think it is reasonable to assert that this is far more useful and appropriate than what the post states.
Delete