You walk to your wardrobe to get
ready for the day. You want to wear a midriff singlet, because it is hot
outside and it makes you look damn fine. But you’re going to meet a group of
not-so-unattractive boys, and you don’t want them to think you’re some “easy
slut”. You swap for a T-shirt. It doesn’t make you feel as good as the midriff,
but at least no one will make nasty assumptions about your sex life.
If this was a meme, it would be a
#relatablememe. But it’s not a meme, its reality for so many girls in our society
who are victimised by the body-policing trend of “slut shaming”. Slut shaming
is commenting, assuming, or discriminating against a girl based on her
appearance or actions as unnecessarily provocative or sexually active. There are
so many issues with this I’m struggling to even find somewhere to start
breaking it down.
So I decided to ask the entity who knows best:
Me: Society, what constitutes a
slut?
Society: Well, it’s a girl who acts
in a way that indicates an inappropriate attitude towards sex and
provocativeness.
Me: Right, so like a girl who cheats?
Society: Yeah kinda, but there’s
sorta more to it… it’s also like, a girl who has too much sex in general.
Me: Oh. Well, how much is too
much sex?
Society: I mean, I dunno but I suppose…
y’know, whatever you think is too much for a respectable girl to have.
Me: But I asked a few different
boys, and they all said something different when I asked how many sexual
partners is too many for a girl.
Society: …um… uhhh… I guess “too
many” depends on what the guy wants. You wouldn’t want a girl who just sleeps
around.
Me: Right… ok, how about this: I
keep seeing thirteen year old girls referred to as “sluts”, but they’re
obviously not sexually active. How does that work?
Society: Oh yeah forgot to add, a
slut can also be a girl who is just too provocative.
Me: What do you mean by too
provocative?
Society: You know, dressing in
those really short clothes that you know they’re only wearing to make guys want
to have sex with them.
Me: They’re thirteen????
Society: Yeah but you can still
be a slut if you wear clothes that have already been labelled as just slutty in
general.
Me: Right, so “slut” is just
pertaining to provocativeness?
Society: I guess, yeah,
Me: Why are girls shamed for being
provocative?
Society: Because girls should be
respectable, otherwise no one will want to date them. It’s just not nice when
girls are too sexual and flaunting it everywhere, they need to be reminded to
keep it in their non-existent pants.
Me: But no one complains when
boys are overly sexual? In fact, they’re treated as legends for having heaps of
sexual partners.
Society: Eh, it’s different with
boys, y’know? They’re meant to be sexual and all.
Me: ...mate, double standard
much?
Society: Yeah I’m shitty like
that, thanks for noticing. Shame how so few people do.
So basically we see that there is
really no definitive set of criteria for what constitutes a “slut”. The most
accurate definition I’ve come across is “A slut is a girl who has more sexual
partners than the slut-shamer deems appropriate.” There is extreme arbitration in
the definition of a slut, and creates a society where women will be judged for
their sex life, promiscuity, or appearance pretty much no matter what.
The main problem with slut
shaming is the aforementioned double standard when it comes to appropriate
levels of sex and promiscuity between men and women. Women have historically
been shamed, discriminated against and abused for being “too sexual”, whatever
that is supposed to mean. However men have almost never faced this problem;
society not only accepts but celebrates sexual men. A guy who hooks up at a
party is a “legend” while she is a “slut”. A guy who takes his shirt off for no
other reason than to flaunt his chest is “bringin’ in the bitches,” a girl who
reveals even part of her chest is a “slut”. A man goes out specifically to have
sex is “getting some action”, a girl who does the same is a “slut”.
Why? Because a male dominated
society seeks to suppress female sexuality. Women who are silenced and shamed
into a lack of sexual activity are easier to control, and it becomes easier for
men to exploit their sexuality. Women who are confident in their promiscuity
and outwardly partake in and enjoy sex are a threat to the patriarchal
standards of our world, and therefore must be shamed into submission. Yeah I know
this sounds melodramatic and ridiculous, but it makes more sense this way: No
one is actively thinking of the above when they police a woman’s revealing
clothes, or judge her for having “too many” sexual partners whilst celebrating
the same characteristics in a man. Instead, they are simply regurgitating
social norms that are based on the social
conditioning that I just outlined. It is something that has manifested
throughout history: in biblical and ancient times there were more serious
punishments for female adulterers than male ones. A woman was expected to be a
virgin upon marriage, whereas the same condition did not apply to men (and in
fact this still happens today, often in countries more strictly controlled by
religion). The use of corsets, female genital mutilation, the taboo on female
masturbation, these are all contributing factors both historically and
currently that condition us to subconsciously believe that women are not meant
to enjoy or be confident in sex, as opposed to men.
Slut shaming is so abhorrent
because it villainises women for their sex drive – something that is
about as natural as you can get – and the way they present their sexuality,
which is held at a completely different and totally sexist standard in
comparison to men. This results in a perpetuation of rape culture, as “sluttiness”
is often used as a defence for a rapist, even though the way a woman presents
herself or behaves in regards to her sexuality has nothing to do with consent. Policing
what women wear is a manifestation of the suppression of female sexuality, and
teaches girls from a young age that they must act according to a certain, very
strict and equally arbitrary standard, when we should be encouraging sexual
exploration and understanding of your body and sexuality.
Society: Gee Hannah, thanks for
letting me know, this is really worrying!
Me: Yup.
Society: What can I do to stop
victimising women for their sexuality?
Me: Firstly, quit using the word
slut. It normalises slut shaming, and perpetuates body and sex policing.
Society: …but that’s really hard!
And the jokes I make are just harmless?
Me: The jokes are harmless in
your head, but they accumulate over the millions of people in our society to
create a very harmful message that seeps through to us all. And yes, changing
your habits like this can be really hard, but surely you putting in that extra
bit of effort is worth creating a society where women don’t feel victimised and
judged, and rape culture is diminished?
Society: Fair point. Ok I’ll try
to stop.
Me: Thanks society, you’re
getting better every day!
Society: Nawww
And they all lived happily ever after.
Please leave your thoughts, questions and comments below :)
Hannah
I think this is a great post and the ideas you've raised here are really interesting. However, on a moral principal, I object to the idea that there is nothing wrong with being promiscuous solely because it is "natural". From what I've read, the main issue with slut shaming is the double standard imposed on men and women. So instead of simply disregarding the calling out of "unnecessary provocation" of women, I believe it would be much better for society to strive towards abolishing the double standard for two main reasons:
ReplyDelete1. By doing so, society recognises the fundamental notion that sex and relationships are acts of maturity and responsibility. A trivialisation of these has lead and will lead to an objectification of women (and men possibly if we abolish the double standard).
2. It's a follow on effect. I think that if we start to impose the same sort of treatment we do to women on men, then it will change the way women act which changes the way men act and so on. Under what you have proposed, we should stop slut shaming but not actually change the behaviour of men and women, which will result in nothing being fixed and society will continue to miss the point of relationships and its seriousness as mentioned in reason number 1.
I think my vision is similar to yours in that it embraces natural sexuality but the way we should approach it is different. In my opinion, abolishing the double standard for men rather than doing nothing about it would be perhaps be better.
Would love to hear your response.
Hi Anon, I'm slightly confused because I think we mostly agree with each other?
DeleteYep definitely abolishing the double standard is fab, completely agree.
Perhaps the clash is that I think calling people out on unnecessary provocation should also be discouages whereas perhaps you think its a good thing but should be implemented onto men too?
The reason I think this way is because policing women's sexuality is so deeply entrenched in society, I cannot begin to list reasons (some are outlined in the paragraph, and also in the rape culture page: http://afeministfatale.blogspot.com.au/p/rape-culture-101.html) And I believe that policing sex and promiscuity can never be removed from its deeply entrenched, inherently sexist background and or context and or undertones.
Also the fact that sex/promiscuity shaming is exactly that: shaming. It makes people feel guilty, insecure and ashamed. Although I would like to get rid of the double standard, I also dont wish to impose those kinds of feelings onto men.
Hope this answers your question!